# [OmniOS-discuss] Silly very-long-term question

Peter Tribble peter.tribble at gmail.com
Mon Dec 12 17:00:24 UTC 2016

- Previous message: [OmniOS-discuss] Silly very-long-term question
- Next message: [OmniOS-discuss] Silly very-long-term question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Dan McDonald <danmcd at omniti.com> wrote:

    > How many  folks in the audience are running 32-bit binaries that HAVE to
    > be 32-bit for whatever reason?  The Y2038 problem crossed my mind today,
    > and the easy permanent cure is to cut off support for 32-bit userland.
    >

    I'm pretty sure that the day job doesn't have anything that is irredeemably
    32-bit.
    We build what we use from source anyway, and virtually everything is 64-bit
    already.

    (Speaking from a wider context, there's a huge amount of stuff that needs
    fixing,
    and it's a pile of work.)

    Don't worry, this isn't a question that'll affect bloody or r151022... heck
    > it probably won't affect r151030 (SUBSEQUENT LTS), but I am curious.
    >

    But r151102 then...

    --
    -Peter Tribble
    http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: <http://lists.omniti.com/pipermail/omnios-discuss/attachments/20161212/94351ea9/attachment.html>

- Previous message: [OmniOS-discuss] Silly very-long-term question
- Next message: [OmniOS-discuss] Silly very-long-term question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the OmniOS-discuss mailing list