`<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Michael Rasmussen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mir@miras.org" target="_blank" onclick="window.open('https://mail.google.com/mail/?view=cm&tf=1&to=mir@miras.org&cc=&bcc=&su=&body=','_blank');return false;">mir@miras.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I am currently on r151008 and my intention is to move to the LTS track<br>
as of r151014. My question is whether this upgrade path will be<br>
supported:<br>
<br>
r151008 -> r151010 -> r151014<br>
<br>
or do I require to follow the full path<br>
<br>
r151008 -> r151010 -> r151012 -> r151014<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This is an interesting question.</div><div><br></div><div>We make effort to make upgrades work between each subsequent normal release: 8->10->12->14, we'll also invest in making the upgrades work between LTSs 6->14. Given that, 8->14 isn't specifically on that list... As 14 approaches, we'll better understand if we get the non-LTS -> LTS skips for free due to the LTS -> LTS effort. Given the nuances of systems and packaging, my guess is: no.</div>
<div> </div></div>-- <br>
<p>Theo Schlossnagle</p>
<p><a href="http://omniti.com/is/theo-schlossnagle" target="_blank">http://omniti.com/is/theo-schlossnagle</a></p>
</div></div>
`