# [OmniOS-discuss] Ang: LX Zones question: Do you miss ipadm(1M)?

Ludovic Orban lorban at bitronix.be
Thu Mar 30 07:47:55 UTC 2017

- Previous message: [OmniOS-discuss] Ang: LX Zones question: Do you miss ipadm(1M)?
- Next message: [OmniOS-discuss] Ang: LX Zones question: Do you miss ipadm(1M)?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    I personally don't need ipadm in my LX zones, nerver missed it and I'm
    pretty certain I wouldn't use it even if it was available. I'd *much*
    prefer to have 7388 though (sorry for insisting, I couldn't resist ;-))

    On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Guenther Alka <alka at hfg-gmuend.de> wrote:

    > Setting ip properties atthe virtualisation layer
    > seems not straight forward to me. Lately I was
    > asked about the problem where DNS onUbuntu 16
    > was not working despite the setting in the zone.cfg
    > (Configurating /etc/resolv in Linux was needed)
    >
    > I would prefer a more ESXi like behaviour where settings
    > about hardware like (lofi) disks, CPU, RAM, vnics are zone
    > settings while network configuration is done by the VM
    > itself with the different but regular Linux tools and ways.
    >
    > A related question
    > Exclusive ip access over a dedicated vnic is working.
    > I had problems with shared/ bridged access to a physical nic
    > that is in use by OmniOS itself or a different zone. Is that possible?
    >
    > And is there a property to limit RAM or CPU of an LX zone?
    >
    > Gea
    >
    >
    >
    > Am 30.03.2017 um 07:30 schrieb Johan Kragsterman:
    >
    >> Hi!
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> -----"OmniOS-discuss" <omnios-discuss-bounces at lists.omniti.com> skrev:
    >> -----
    >> Till: OmniOS-discuss <omnios-discuss at lists.omniti.com>
    >> Från: Dan McDonald
    >> Sänt av: "OmniOS-discuss"
    >> Datum: 2017-03-30 02:12
    >> Ärende: [OmniOS-discuss] LX Zones question: Do you miss ipadm(1M)?
    >>
    >> One of the checkbox-items for this bloody *was* "ipadm for LX zones".
    >> After having some conversations with Joyent, and noticing a lack of
    >> enthusiasm here, I'm wondering if I should even bother with it for this
    >> bloody & r151022.
    >>
    >> Please speak up if you have ANY opinion on this subject.  I'm honestly
    >> not sure, so I wouldn't be taking sides or advocating one way or the other.
    >>
    >> Thanks,
    >> Dan
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> ipadm is a nice and versatile tool, and I would for sure like to see it
    >> in LX zones. Though the priority of the development is another question,
    >> WHEN to put it there.
    >> r151022 is an LTS release, and I believe it would be nice to have ipadm
    >> in there, but if you can't get it there before release, due to other
    >> priorities, perhaps you can backport it later?
    >>
    >> Rgrds Johan
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    > _______________________________________________
    > OmniOS-discuss mailing list
    > OmniOS-discuss at lists.omniti.com
    > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss
    >
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: <http://lists.omniti.com/pipermail/omnios-discuss/attachments/20170330/ce9d7616/attachment.html>

- Previous message: [OmniOS-discuss] Ang: LX Zones question: Do you miss ipadm(1M)?
- Next message: [OmniOS-discuss] Ang: LX Zones question: Do you miss ipadm(1M)?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the OmniOS-discuss mailing list