`<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 31.01.17 um 00:15 schrieb Richard
Elling:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:4634E48A-8DEA-4A48-8844-297AA14E37BF@richardelling.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Jan 29, 2017, at 3:10 AM, Stephan Budach <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:stephan.budach@JVM.DE"><stephan.budach@JVM.DE></a> wrote:
Hi,
just to wrap this up… I decided to go with 15 additional LUNs on each storage zpool, to avoid zfs complainign about replication mismatches. I know, I cluld have done otherwise, but it somehow felt better this way.
After all three underlying zpools were "pimped", I was able to mount the problematic zpool in my S11.1 host without any issue. It just took a coulpe of seconds and zfs reported approx 2.53MB resilvered…
Now, there's a scrub running on that zpool tnat is just happily humming away on the data.
Thanks for all the input, everyone.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
may all your scrubs complete cleanly :-)
— richard
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">
Stephan
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
I'm on it! ;) So far it has been running smoothly, only giving a
couple of read errors for a ZFS that is encrypted and to which ZFS I
hadn't the keys at hand, but otherwise, it's running fine. It will
take another 9 days, though to finish, running at 3x100MB/s… <br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Stephan<br>
</body>
</html>
`