# [OmniOS-discuss] nfsv4 acls wtf moment

Natxo Asenjo natxo.asenjo at gmail.com
Sun May 12 16:21:32 EDT 2013

- Previous message: [OmniOS-discuss] nfsv4 acls wtf moment
- Next message: [OmniOS-discuss] nfsv4 acls wtf moment
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Natxo Asenjo <natxo.asenjo at gmail.com>wrote:

    > On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Paul B. Henson <henson at acm.org> wrote:
    >
    >> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 09:12:43AM +0200, Natxo Asenjo wrote:Does the
    >> linux nfs client complain at all when you do the copy with
    >>
    > aclmode=restricted? The client would get a success for the open, but the
    >> following setattr op would fail, and I wasn't sure how the nfs client
    >> would deal with that. From the strace output it looks like the
    >> underlying nfs setattr failure isn't passed back up to the userland
    >> code, it looks like the open just succeeds as normal. Cool.
    >>
    >>
    > no, it does when moving a file though :
    >

    mm, when using scp it bypasses the acl as well ..., grrr.

    So far I have seen that copying the files *after* the the files have been
    copied from the remote client, then the acl is preserverd.

    I guess this will have to do until nfs4.1 is in illumos (is there a roadmap
    on that)?

    > --
    > groet,
    > natxo
    >
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: <http://lists.omniti.com/pipermail/omnios-discuss/attachments/20130512/8e197303/attachment.html>

- Previous message: [OmniOS-discuss] nfsv4 acls wtf moment
- Next message: [OmniOS-discuss] nfsv4 acls wtf moment
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the OmniOS-discuss mailing list