`<div dir="ltr">I personally don't need ipadm in my LX zones, nerver missed it and I'm pretty certain I wouldn't use it even if it was available. I'd *much* prefer to have <span style="color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8px">7388 though (sorry for insisting, I couldn't resist ;-))</span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Guenther Alka <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alka@hfg-gmuend.de" target="_blank">alka@hfg-gmuend.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Setting ip properties atthe virtualisation layer<br>
seems not straight forward to me. Lately I was<br>
asked about the problem where DNS onUbuntu 16<br>
was not working despite the setting in the zone.cfg<br>
(Configurating /etc/resolv in Linux was needed)<br>
<br>
I would prefer a more ESXi like behaviour where settings<br>
about hardware like (lofi) disks, CPU, RAM, vnics are zone<br>
settings while network configuration is done by the VM<br>
itself with the different but regular Linux tools and ways.<br>
<br>
A related question<br>
Exclusive ip access over a dedicated vnic is working.<br>
I had problems with shared/ bridged access to a physical nic<br>
that is in use by OmniOS itself or a different zone. Is that possible?<br>
<br>
And is there a property to limit RAM or CPU of an LX zone?<br>
<br>
Gea<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
Am 30.03.2017 um 07:30 schrieb Johan Kragsterman:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi!<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-----"OmniOS-discuss" <<a href="mailto:omnios-discuss-bounces@lists.omniti.com" target="_blank">omnios-discuss-bounces@lists.<wbr>omniti.com</a>> skrev: -----<br>
Till: OmniOS-discuss <<a href="mailto:omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com" target="_blank">omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.c<wbr>om</a>><br>
Från: Dan McDonald<br>
Sänt av: "OmniOS-discuss"<br>
Datum: 2017-03-30 02:12<br>
Ärende: [OmniOS-discuss] LX Zones question: Do you miss ipadm(1M)?<br>
<br>
One of the checkbox-items for this bloody *was* "ipadm for LX zones". After having some conversations with Joyent, and noticing a lack of enthusiasm here, I'm wondering if I should even bother with it for this bloody & r151022.<br>
<br>
Please speak up if you have ANY opinion on this subject. I'm honestly not sure, so I wouldn't be taking sides or advocating one way or the other.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Dan<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
ipadm is a nice and versatile tool, and I would for sure like to see it in LX zones. Though the priority of the development is another question, WHEN to put it there.<br>
r151022 is an LTS release, and I believe it would be nice to have ipadm in there, but if you can't get it there before release, due to other priorities, perhaps you can backport it later?<br>
<br>
Rgrds Johan<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
OmniOS-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com" target="_blank">OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.co<wbr>m</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.omniti.com/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/omnios-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
`