`<div dir="ltr"><div>Going to try to answer both responses in one message..</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Short answer, yes. … Keep in mind that<br><br>1. a scrub runs in the background (so as not to impact production I/O, this was not always the case and caused serious issues in the past with a pool being unresponsive due to a scrub)<br>
<br>2. a scrub essentially walks the zpool examining every transaction in order (as does a resilver)<br><br>So the time to complete a scrub depends on how many write transactions since the pool was created (which is generally related to the amount of data but not always). You are limited by the random I/O capability of the disks involved. With VMs I assume this is a file server, so the I/O size will also affect performance.</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>I haven't noticed any slowdowns in our virtual environments, so I guess that's a good thing it's so low priority that it doesn't impact workloads. </div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Run the numbers… you are scanning 24.2TB at about 5.5MB/sec … 4,613,734 seconds or 54 days. And that assumes the same rate for all of the scan. The rate will change as other I/O competes for resources.<br></blockquote><div>
<br></div><div>The number was fluctuating when I started the scrub, and I had seen it go as high as 35MB/s at one point. I am certain that our Hyper-V workload has increased since the last scrub, so this does make sense.</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Looks like you have a fair bit of activity going on (almost 1MB/sec of writes per spindle).<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>As Richard correctly states below, this is the aggregate since boot (uptime ~56 days). I have another output from iostat as per his instructions below. </div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Since this is storage for VMs, I assume this is the storage server for separate compute servers? Have you tuned the block size for the file share you are using? That can make a huge difference in performance.<br></blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Both the Hyper-V and VMware LUNs are created with 64K block sizes. From what I've read of other performance and tuning articles, that is the optimal block size (I did some limited testing when first configuring the SAN, but results were somewhat inconclusive). Hyper-V hosts our testing environment (we integrate with TFS, a MS product, so we have no choice here) and probably make up the bulk of the workload (~300+ test VMs with various OSes). VMware hosts our production servers (Exchange, file servers, SQL, AD, etc - ~50+ VMs).</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">I also noted that you only have a single LOG device. Best Practice is to mirror log devices so you do not lose any data in flight if hit by a power outage (of course, if this server has more UPS runtime that all the clients that may not matter).<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Actually, I do have a mirror ZIL device, it's just disabled at this time (my ZIL devices are ZeusRAMs). At some point, I was troubleshooting some kernel panics (turned out to be a faulty SSD on the rpool), and hadn't re-enabled it yet. Thanks for the reminder (and yes, we do have a UPS as well). </div>
<div><br></div><div>And oops.. re-attaching the ZIL as a mirror triggered a resilver now, suspending or canceling the scrub? Will monitor this and restart the scrub if it doesn't by itself.</div><div><br></div><div><div>
pool: tank</div><div> state: ONLINE</div><div>status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered. The pool will</div><div> continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.</div><div>action: Wait for the resilver to complete.</div>
<div> scan: resilver in progress since Tue Jul 29 14:48:48 2014</div><div> 3.89T scanned out of 24.5T at 3.06G/s, 1h55m to go</div><div> 0 resilvered, 15.84% done</div></div><div><br></div><div>At least it's going very fast. EDIT: Now about 67% done as I finish writing this, speed dropping to ~1.3G/s. </div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div class="">maybe, maybe not<br></div><div><div class=""><div><br></div></div><div>this is slower than most, surely slower than desired</div></div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Unfortunately reattaching the mirror to my log device triggered a resilver. Not sure if this is desired behavior, but yes, 5.5MB/s seems quite slow. Hopefully after the resilver the scrub will progress where it left off. </div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div>The estimate is often very wrong, especially for busy systems.</div><div>If this is an older ZFS implementation, this pool is likely getting pounded by the</div><div>ZFS write throttle. There are some tunings that can be applied, but the old write</div>
<div>throttle is not a stable control system, so it will always be a little bit unpredictable.</div></div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The system is on r151008 (my BE states that I upgraded back in February, putting me in r151008j or so), with all the pools upgraded for the new enhancements as well as activating the new L2ARC compression feature. Reading the release notes, the ZFS write throttle enhancements were in since r151008e so I should be good there.</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div class=""><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><div># iostat -xnze</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Unfortunately, this is the performance since boot and is not suitable for performance</div>
<div>analysis unless the system has been rebooted in the past 10 minutes or so. You'll need</div><div>to post the second batch from "iostat -zxCn 60 2"</div></div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><br>
</div><div>Ah yes, that was my mistake. Output from second count (before re-attaching log mirror):</div><div><br></div><div># iostat -zxCn 60 2</div><div><br></div><div> extended device statistics</div>
<div> r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device</div><div> 255.7 1077.7 6294.0 41335.1 0.0 1.9 0.0 1.4 0 153 c1</div><div> 5.3 23.9 118.5 811.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0 3 c1t5000C50055F8723Bd0</div>
<div> 5.9 14.5 110.0 834.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0 2 c1t5000C50055E66B63d0</div><div> 5.6 16.6 123.8 822.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0 2 c1t5000C50055F87E73d0</div><div> 4.7 27.8 118.6 796.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0 3 c1t5000C50055F8BFA3d0</div>
<div> 5.6 14.5 139.7 833.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9E123d0</div><div> 4.4 27.1 112.3 825.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0 2 c1t5000C50055F9F0B3d0</div><div> 5.0 20.2 121.7 803.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9D3B3d0</div>
<div> 5.4 26.4 137.0 857.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0 4 c1t5000C50055E4FDE7d0</div><div> 4.7 12.3 123.7 832.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9A607d0</div><div> 5.0 23.9 125.9 830.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0 3 c1t5000C50055F8CDA7d0</div>
<div> 4.5 31.4 112.2 814.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0 3 c1t5000C50055E65877d0</div><div> 5.2 24.4 130.6 872.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9E7D7d0</div><div> 4.1 21.8 103.7 797.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0 3 c1t5000C50055FA0AF7d0</div>
<div> 5.5 24.8 129.8 802.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0 4 c1t5000C50055F9FE87d0</div><div> 5.7 17.7 137.2 797.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9F91Bd0</div><div> 6.0 30.6 139.1 852.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.5 0 4 c1t5000C50055F9FEABd0</div>
<div> 6.1 34.1 137.8 929.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.9 0 6 c1t5000C50055F9F63Bd0</div><div> 4.1 15.9 101.8 791.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9F3EBd0</div><div> 6.4 23.2 155.2 878.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9F80Bd0</div>
<div> 4.5 23.5 106.2 825.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9FB8Bd0</div><div> 4.0 23.2 101.1 788.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9F92Bd0</div><div> 4.4 11.3 125.7 782.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0 3 c1t5000C50055F8905Fd0</div>
<div> 4.6 20.4 129.2 823.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0 3 c1t5000C50055F8D48Fd0</div><div> 5.1 19.7 142.9 887.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9F89Fd0</div><div> 5.6 11.4 129.1 776.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9EF2Fd0</div>
<div> 5.6 23.7 137.4 811.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0 3 c1t5000C50055F8C3ABd0</div><div> 6.8 13.9 132.4 834.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0 3 c1t5000C50055E66053d0</div><div> 5.2 26.7 126.9 857.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0 3 c1t5000C50055E66503d0</div>
<div> 4.2 27.1 104.6 825.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9D3E3d0</div><div> 5.2 30.7 140.9 852.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.5 0 4 c1t5000C50055F84FB7d0</div><div> 5.4 16.1 124.3 791.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0 3 c1t5000C50055F8E017d0</div>
<div> 3.8 31.4 89.7 814.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0 4 c1t5000C50055E579F7d0</div><div> 4.6 27.5 116.0 796.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.6 0 4 c1t5000C50055E65807d0</div><div> 4.0 21.5 99.7 797.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0 3 c1t5000C50055F84A97d0</div>
<div> 4.7 20.2 116.3 803.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0 3 c1t5000C50055F87D97d0</div><div> 5.0 11.5 121.5 776.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9F637d0</div><div> 4.9 11.3 112.4 782.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 0 3 c1t5000C50055E65ABBd0</div>
<div> 5.3 11.8 142.5 832.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0 3 c1t5000C50055F8BF9Bd0</div><div> 5.0 20.3 121.4 823.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0 3 c1t5000C50055F8A22Bd0</div><div> 6.6 24.3 170.3 872.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9379Bd0</div>
<div> 5.8 16.3 121.7 822.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0 2 c1t5000C50055E57A5Fd0</div><div> 5.3 17.7 146.5 797.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0 3 c1t5000C50055F8CCAFd0</div><div> 5.7 34.1 141.5 929.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.7 0 5 c1t5000C50055F8B80Fd0</div>
<div> 5.5 23.8 125.7 830.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0 3 c1t5000C50055F9FA1Fd0</div><div> 5.0 23.2 127.9 878.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0 3 c1t5000C50055E65F0Fd0</div><div> 5.2 14.0 163.7 833.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0 3 c1t5000C50055F8BE3Fd0</div>
<div> 4.6 18.9 122.8 887.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0 3 c1t5000C50055F8B21Fd0</div><div> 5.5 23.6 137.4 825.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0 3 c1t5000C50055F8A46Fd0</div><div> 4.9 24.6 116.7 802.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0 4 c1t5000C50055F856CFd0</div>
<div> 4.9 23.4 120.8 788.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0 3 c1t5000C50055E6606Fd0</div><div> 234.9 170.1 4079.9 11127.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 0 9 c2</div><div> 119.0 28.9 2083.8 670.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 3 c2t500117310015D579d0</div>
<div> 115.9 27.4 1996.1 634.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 3 c2t50011731001631FDd0</div><div> 0.0 113.8 0.0 9822.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.0 0 2 c2t5000A72A3007811Dd0</div><div> 0.1 18.5 0.0 64.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c4</div>
<div> 0.1 9.2 0.0 32.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c4t0d0</div><div> 0.0 9.2 0.0 32.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c4t1d0</div><div> 229.8 58.1 3987.4 1308.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0 6 c12</div>
<div> 114.2 27.7 1994.8 626.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 3 c12t500117310015D59Ed0</div><div> 115.5 30.4 1992.6 682.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 3 c12t500117310015D54Ed0</div><div> 0.1 17.1 0.0 64.8 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.1 0 0 rpool</div>
<div> 720.3 1298.4 14361.2 53770.8 18.7 2.3 9.3 1.1 6 68 tank</div><div> </div><div>Is 153% busy correct on c1? Seems to me that disks are quite "busy", but are handling the workload just fine (wait at 6% and asvc_t at 1.1ms)</div>
<div><br></div><div>Interestingly, this is the same output now that the resilver is running:</div><div><br></div><div><div> extended device statistics</div><div> r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device</div>
<div> 2876.9 1041.1 25400.7 38189.1 0.0 37.9 0.0 9.7 0 2011 c1</div><div> 60.8 26.1 540.1 845.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 8.3 0 39 c1t5000C50055F8723Bd0</div><div> 58.4 14.2 511.6 740.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 10.1 0 39 c1t5000C50055E66B63d0</div>
<div> 60.2 16.3 529.3 756.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 10.1 0 41 c1t5000C50055F87E73d0</div><div> 57.5 24.9 527.6 841.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 9.0 0 40 c1t5000C50055F8BFA3d0</div><div> 57.9 14.5 543.5 765.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 9.8 0 38 c1t5000C50055F9E123d0</div>
<div> 57.9 23.9 516.6 806.9 0.0 0.8 0.0 9.3 0 40 c1t5000C50055F9F0B3d0</div><div> 59.8 24.6 554.1 857.5 0.0 0.8 0.0 9.6 0 42 c1t5000C50055F9D3B3d0</div><div> 56.5 21.0 480.4 715.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 8.9 0 37 c1t5000C50055E4FDE7d0</div>
<div> 54.8 9.7 473.5 737.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 11.2 0 39 c1t5000C50055F9A607d0</div><div> 55.8 20.2 457.3 708.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 9.9 0 40 c1t5000C50055F8CDA7d0</div><div> 57.8 28.6 487.0 796.1 0.0 0.9 0.0 9.9 0 45 c1t5000C50055E65877d0</div>
<div> 60.8 27.1 572.6 823.7 0.0 0.8 0.0 8.8 0 41 c1t5000C50055F9E7D7d0</div><div> 55.8 21.1 478.2 766.6 0.0 0.7 0.0 9.7 0 40 c1t5000C50055FA0AF7d0</div><div> 57.0 22.8 528.3 724.5 0.0 0.8 0.0 9.6 0 41 c1t5000C50055F9FE87d0</div>
<div> 56.2 10.8 465.2 715.6 0.0 0.7 0.0 10.4 0 38 c1t5000C50055F9F91Bd0</div><div> 59.2 29.4 524.6 740.9 0.0 0.8 0.0 8.9 0 41 c1t5000C50055F9FEABd0</div><div> 57.3 30.7 496.7 788.3 0.0 0.8 0.0 9.1 0 42 c1t5000C50055F9F63Bd0</div>
<div> 55.5 16.3 461.9 652.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 10.1 0 39 c1t5000C50055F9F3EBd0</div><div> 57.2 22.1 495.1 701.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 9.8 0 41 c1t5000C50055F9F80Bd0</div><div> 59.5 30.2 543.1 741.8 0.0 0.9 0.0 9.6 0 45 c1t5000C50055F9FB8Bd0</div>
<div> 56.5 25.1 515.4 786.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 8.6 0 38 c1t5000C50055F9F92Bd0</div><div> 61.8 12.5 540.6 790.9 0.0 0.8 0.0 10.3 0 41 c1t5000C50055F8905Fd0</div><div> 57.0 19.8 521.0 774.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 9.6 0 39 c1t5000C50055F8D48Fd0</div>
<div> 56.3 16.3 517.7 724.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 9.9 0 38 c1t5000C50055F9F89Fd0</div><div> 57.0 13.4 504.5 790.5 0.0 0.8 0.0 10.7 0 40 c1t5000C50055F9EF2Fd0</div><div> 55.0 26.1 477.6 845.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 8.3 0 36 c1t5000C50055F8C3ABd0</div>
<div> 57.8 14.1 518.7 740.7 0.0 0.8 0.0 10.8 0 41 c1t5000C50055E66053d0</div><div> 55.9 20.8 490.2 715.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 9.0 0 37 c1t5000C50055E66503d0</div><div> 57.0 24.1 509.7 806.9 0.0 0.8 0.0 10.0 0 41 c1t5000C50055F9D3E3d0</div>
<div> 59.1 29.2 504.1 740.9 0.0 0.8 0.0 9.3 0 44 c1t5000C50055F84FB7d0</div><div> 54.4 16.3 449.5 652.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 10.4 0 39 c1t5000C50055F8E017d0</div><div> 57.8 28.4 503.3 796.1 0.0 0.9 0.0 10.1 0 45 c1t5000C50055E579F7d0</div>
<div> 58.2 24.9 502.0 841.7 0.0 0.8 0.0 9.2 0 40 c1t5000C50055E65807d0</div><div> 58.2 20.7 513.4 766.6 0.0 0.8 0.0 9.8 0 41 c1t5000C50055F84A97d0</div><div> 56.5 24.9 508.0 857.5 0.0 0.8 0.0 9.2 0 40 c1t5000C50055F87D97d0</div>
<div> 53.4 13.5 449.9 790.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 10.7 0 38 c1t5000C50055F9F637d0</div><div> 57.0 11.8 503.0 790.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 10.6 0 39 c1t5000C50055E65ABBd0</div><div> 55.4 9.6 461.1 737.9 0.0 0.8 0.0 11.6 0 40 c1t5000C50055F8BF9Bd0</div>
<div> 55.7 19.7 484.6 774.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 9.9 0 40 c1t5000C50055F8A22Bd0</div><div> 57.6 27.1 518.2 823.7 0.0 0.8 0.0 8.9 0 40 c1t5000C50055F9379Bd0</div><div> 59.6 17.0 528.0 756.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 10.1 0 41 c1t5000C50055E57A5Fd0</div>
<div> 61.2 10.8 530.0 715.6 0.0 0.8 0.0 10.7 0 40 c1t5000C50055F8CCAFd0</div><div> 58.0 30.8 493.3 788.3 0.0 0.8 0.0 9.4 0 43 c1t5000C50055F8B80Fd0</div><div> 56.5 19.9 490.7 708.7 0.0 0.8 0.0 10.0 0 40 c1t5000C50055F9FA1Fd0</div>
<div> 56.1 22.4 484.2 701.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 9.5 0 39 c1t5000C50055E65F0Fd0</div><div> 59.2 14.6 560.9 765.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 9.8 0 39 c1t5000C50055F8BE3Fd0</div><div> 57.9 16.2 546.0 724.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 10.1 0 40 c1t5000C50055F8B21Fd0</div>
<div> 59.5 30.0 553.2 741.8 0.0 0.9 0.0 9.8 0 45 c1t5000C50055F8A46Fd0</div><div> 57.4 22.5 504.0 724.5 0.0 0.8 0.0 9.6 0 41 c1t5000C50055F856CFd0</div><div> 58.4 24.6 531.4 786.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 8.4 0 38 c1t5000C50055E6606Fd0</div>
<div> 511.0 161.4 7572.1 11260.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 0 14 c2</div><div> 252.3 20.1 3776.3 458.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0 6 c2t500117310015D579d0</div><div> 258.8 18.0 3795.7 350.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0 6 c2t50011731001631FDd0</div>
<div> 0.0 123.4 0.0 10451.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.0 0 3 c2t5000A72A3007811Dd0</div><div> 0.2 16.1 1.9 56.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c4</div><div> 0.2 8.1 1.6 28.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c4t0d0</div>
<div> 0.0 8.1 0.3 28.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c4t1d0</div><div> 495.6 163.6 7168.9 11290.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 0 14 c12</div><div> 0.0 123.4 0.0 10451.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.0 0 3 c12t5000A72B300780FFd0</div>
<div> 248.2 18.1 3645.8 323.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0 5 c12t500117310015D59Ed0</div><div> 247.4 22.1 3523.1 516.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0 6 c12t500117310015D54Ed0</div><div> 0.2 14.8 1.9 56.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.1 0 0 rpool</div>
<div> 3883.5 1357.7 40141.6 60739.5 22.8 38.6 4.4 7.4 54 100 tank</div></div><div><br></div><div>It is very busy with alot of wait % and higher asvc_t (2011% busy on c1?!). I'm assuming resilvers are alot more aggressive than scrubs.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div><div class="h5"><div></div></div></div><div>There are many variables here, the biggest of which is the current non-scrub load.</div></div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><div>
<br></div><div>I might have lost 2 weeks of scrub time, depending on whether the scrub will resume where it left off. I'll update when I can. </div><div> </div></div>
`