`<div><div class="gmail_msg">It's a single binary. That can be downloaded.</div><div class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg"></div><div class="gmail_msg">I don't think the author is available to generate the test case. My question was as an end user how can we determine why the software is not working on LX. </div></div><div><div class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg"></div><div class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg"><div class="gmail_quote gmail_msg"><div class="gmail_msg">On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:34 PM Dan McDonald <<a href="mailto:danmcd@omniti.com" class="gmail_msg" target="_blank">danmcd@omniti.com</a>> wrote:<br class="gmail_msg"></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote gmail_msg" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg">> On Jan 9, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Mini Trader <<a href="mailto:miniflowtrader@gmail.com" class="gmail_msg" target="_blank">miniflowtrader@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg">><br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg">> The test case was in my previous post.<br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg">Does this require a whole wad of installation?<br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg">I was hoping you (or the hashbackup folks) would be able to produce a smaller, easy-to-compile, test case of some sort. They told you what they thought the problem was, they should be able to extract the bit of failing code and shrink it to a test case.<br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg">Dan<br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg"></blockquote></div></div></div>
`