`<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>Unfortunately for the past couple years panics on disk failure has been the norm. All my
production systems are HA with RSF-1, so at least things come back
online relatively quick. There are quite a few open tickets in the
Illumos bug tracker related to mpt_sas related panics. <br><br>Most
of the work to fix these problems has been committed in the past year,
though problems still exist. For example, my systems are dual path SAS,
however, mpt_sas will panic if you pull a cable instead of dropping a
path to the disks. Dan McDonald is actively working to resolve this.
He is also pushing a bug fix in genunix from Nexenta that appears to fix
a lot of the panic problems. I'll know for sure in a few months after
I see a disk or two drop if it truly fixes things. Hans Rosenfeld at
Nexenta is responsible for most of the updates to mpt_sas including
support for 3008 (12G SAS).<br><br></div><div>I haven't run any 12G SAS
yet, but plan to on my next build in a couple months. This will be
about 300TB using an 84 disk JBOD. All the code from Nexenta to support
the 3008 appears to be in Illumos now, and they fully support it so I
suspect it's pretty stable now. From what I understand there may be
some 12G performance fixes coming sometime. <br><br>The fault manager is nice when the system doesn't panic. When it panics, the fault manger never
gets a chance to take action. It is still the consensus that is is
better to run pools without hot spares because there are situations the
fault manager will do bad things. I witnessed this myself when
building a system and the fault manger replaced 5 disks in a raidz2 vdev
inside 1 minute, trashing the pool. I haven't completely yield to the
"best practice". I now run one hot spare per pool. I figure with raidz2,
the odds of the fault manager causing something catastrophic is much
less possible. <br><br></div><div>-Chip<br></div><div><br></div><br><br>On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Linda Kateley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lkateley@kateley.com" target="_blank">lkateley@kateley.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
I have to build and maintain my own system. I usually help others
build(i teach zfs and freenas classes/consulting). I really love
fault management in solaris and miss it. Just thought since it's my
system and I get to choose I would use omni. I have 20+ years using
solaris and only 2 on freebsd. <br>
<br>
I like freebsd for how well tuned for zfs oob. I miss the network,
v12n and resource controls in solaris. <br>
<br>
Concerned about panics on disk failure. Is that common?<br>
<br></div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
linda<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<div>On 7/9/15 9:30 PM, Schweiss, Chip
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>Linda,<br>
<br>
</div>
I have 3.5 PB running under OmniOS. All my systems have LSI
2108 HBAs which is considered the best choice for HBAs. <br>
<br>
Illumos leaves a bit to be desired with handling faults from
disks or SAS problems, but things under OmniOS have been
improving, much thanks to Dan McDonald and OmniTI. We have
a paid support on all of our production systems with
OmniTI. Their response and dedication has been very good.
Other than the occasional panic and restart from a disk
failure, OmniOS has been solid. ZFS of course never has
lost a single bit of information. <br>
<br>
</div>
I'd be curious why you're looking to move, have there been
specific problems under BSD or ZoL? I've been slowly
evaluating FreeBSD ZFS, but of course the skeletons in the
closet never seem to come out until you do something big.<br>
<br>
</div>
-Chip<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Linda
Kateley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lkateley@kateley.com" target="_blank">lkateley@kateley.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hey is
there anyone out there running big zfs on omni?<br>
<br>
I have been doing mostly zol and freebsd for the last year
but have to build a 300+TB box and i want to come back home
to roots(solaris). Feeling kind of hesitant :) Also, if you
had to do over, is there anything you would do different.<br>
<br>
Also, what is the go to HBA these days? Seems like i saw
stable code for lsi 3008?<br>
<br>
TIA<br>
<br>
linda<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
OmniOS-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com" target="_blank">OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div><span class=""><font color="#888888"><pre cols="72">--
Linda Kateley
Kateley Company
Skype ID-kateleyco
<a href="http://kateleyco.com" target="_blank">http://kateleyco.com</a>
</pre>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>
`